<aside> <img src="/icons/light-bulb_yellow.svg" alt="/icons/light-bulb_yellow.svg" width="40px" /> Liquidity Void is a real gap where no actual trading happened. 0 trades were booked. For that to be balanced, we need both Buyside (up) delivery and Sellside (down) delivery. Every Gap/Inefficiency should have both sides of delivery.
</aside>
So far inside that liquidity void, the algorithm has delivered only Buyside (up) delivery. It’s reasonable to expect a move down Sellside delivery. Once that occurs, then the real narrative will be in play. Do we go higher or do we go lower? And when we leave that range it will act as a balance price range, and whatever direction it works from after the BPR is established, that's probably going to be the price run that has a lot more sustainability.
When you have a bias, when you have a narrative in play that you think the market will deliver either on a buy-side run or sell-side run, and you're inside of an inefficiency, you need to be cognizant of that the grading of that range or inefficiency. We're using logic based on inefficiencies and/or a range that is implied; it may not be there technically yet. That is a teaching from ICT CC.
<aside> 💎 On RTH chart, whenever you get 2 BISI matching each other and no Sellside has been delivered yet, you can expect that to happen next.
</aside>
<aside> 💎 Draw the C.E of the 2 Wicks. You want to be buying inside that range, but below the C.E. of the higher wick.
</aside>